Taking a Look at Human Cloning - 1067 Words

The discovery of the cells in 1665 brought a huge development in science and also led to another striking discovery: copying cells; in other words, cloning. It did not take a long time for scientists to understand that the same qualified organisms could be created by using and copying cells. After the first successful mammal cloning, Dolly the sheep in 1997, science world was proud, but not satisfied yet. Curiosity and enthusiasm manipulated scientists to reach the climax of the cloning history with an astonishing, but a risky discovery: the first successful stem cell cloning in 2013 which declares the possibility of human cloning. On one hand, supporters think human cloning is a miracle and the masterpiece of science. On the other hand, considering the cons of human cloning, opponents think human cloning should be illegitimate; hence, it is illegal in countries such as Canada, India, Romania, Germany, Serbia, USA, and Australia. Human cloning should remain illegal because of ethical , economic, social and health reasons. To begin with, human cloning should be regarded as illegal because it is against ethics due to the religion conflict, possibility of excluding cloned humans and usage for evil aims. Initially, according to the majority of religions, reproducing offspring within unnatural ways means to intervene in the God’s business; in other words, to rebel against the God. To demonstrate, considering the belief that the God created the human beings and is the only oneShow MoreRelatedTaking a Look at Human Cloning848 Words   |  3 PagesHuman cloning is the process of taking an emptied human embryo and inserting the human DNA or the DNA of any living creature. After all this the embryo will grow and form as if it were in the womb and conceived normally. Human cloning is not just some make believe idea, it is here. Human cloning can save countless lives through stem cell research or by finding cures for diseases. Human cloning is not just cloning peopl e depending on the cells in the embryo the embryo will grow to become those selectedRead MoreJohn Stuart Mill s Philosophy On The Morality And Ethical Nature Of The Subject1507 Words   |  7 Pagessubject. Cloning can be viewed a few different ways based on the teachings in philosophy one follows. Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is a branch of philosophy, which bases its understanding of right action on consequences. More precisely, an act is considered right if it creates the most happiness (pleasure), and the least pain, for the greatest number of people affected by that action. In this way, utilitarianism is sometimes called a moral calculus. A utilitarian approach to cloning would lookRead MoreThe Controversy of Genetic Cloning873 Words   |  3 Pages Genetic cloning is one of the most controversial topics of all time. People, specifically scientists, are constantly searching for ways to improve the quality of human life. As a result, they began genetically engineering animals and are currently in search of a method to genetically engineer humans as well; which is called human cloning. There are many reasons why people should not go forward with this step since genetic cloning, consequently human cloning, does not respect nature nor does itRead MoreCloning And Its Implications On Human Cloning1497 Words   |  6 PagesCloning and Its Sociobiological Implications Picture this: walking down a street and seeing someone who looks exactly like you. They do the same things as you, act the same way you do, and are exactly alike in several ways. But have people ever considered the consequences of human cloning if it becomes permitted? Human cloning might seem like something out of a science-fiction novel, but it may someday be possible with advances in science and technology. This will result in the creation of severalRead More Human Cloning Should be Permitted Essay example1371 Words   |  6 PagesHuman Cloning Should be Permitted What would you say if I told you that scientists had just developed a new procedure that could lead not only to the cure for cancer, but would provide an unlimited source of organ donors and could lead to the first effective treatment of nerve damage? Now adding on to this scenario lets say that our government was taking action to ban this new procedure because of a few myths and some loud mouthed conservatives. This scenario is true and is taking placeRead MoreThe Permissable Nature of Cloning Illustrated in Jennifer and Rachel by † Lee M. Silver664 Words   |  3 PagesIn â€Å"Jennifer and Rachel,† Lee M. Silver argues that reproductive cloning deems permissible to those who encourage it, as opposed to those who reject it and don’t want to run the risk of how they’ll look in the eyes of society. Jennifer, an independent career driven woman, believes that the best way to have a baby of her own at her age is by cloning. Silver’s description of the cloning procedure is done by retrieving cells from the willing adult; prepare the cells for merging to unfertilized eggsRead MoreEssay on Cloning Informative Speech1597 Words   |  7 PagesCloning and Stem Cell Research S/P: To inform my audience about cloning and cell stem research. C/I: The benefits and ethical issues of cloning and cell stem research. Introduction Specific purpose: Today I’m going to inform you about â€Å"Cloning Technology and Stem Cell Research†. Attention getter: Imagine yourself dying from heart disease or liver failure, and the only way to live was to have an exact clone of your heartRead MoreCloning : The Future Of Medicine And The Curing Of Diseases1427 Words   |  6 PagesCloning By: Joshua Weidner Cloning: is it the future of medicine and the curing of diseases or is it the beginning of an unholy tragedy? Cloning needs to be looked into for the fact it could help save many people s lives. Before I decided to study the subject I had no idea how much cloning could help us as the human race. Cloning is a very promising field of study and could hold the key to the future of what it means to be human. Almost everyone has come to believe that the first animal to beRead More Cloning Essay1224 Words   |  5 PagesShould Human Cloning be Legal? nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Cloning captured the public’s attention when Scottish scientists startled the world in July of 1996 when they announced the birth of a sheep named Dolly which they had cloned from the nucleus of an adult mammary cell and a sheep egg. Ever since this spectacular event occurred people have been thinking about the possibility of cloning humans. WhatRead MoreIs Cloning Good For The Environment?1549 Words   |  7 PagesCloning is done when a cell is replicated by using asexual reproduction and turns out to be the exact same as the host. Most people believe that cloning is very harmful and weird, while some believe that cloning is good for the environment and, it helps the world become very successful. I believe that cloning is horrible because it causes large offspring syndrome, has a very high failure percentage, has unknown consequences, the economy is affected poorly, causes an abnormal population increase,

Biodiversity Free Essays

In today’s world people should be more concern about saving every specious of plant and animal. Every plant or animal species including man plays important role in the life cycle. Let us consider simple example, supponse in our envirnoment we do lot of deforestation for home, industry, schools, hospitals, etc. We will write a custom essay sample on Biodiversity or any similar topic only for you Order Now .This will spoil whole natural life cycle. Lot of species will be destoryed in doing so. Suppose the loss has resulted in decreasing and increasing death ratio. Beacause of which the carnivours animal will start dying due to lack of food or we can say dependency. Then the human will have to suffer with this. No food and the environment changes like abnormal rain or temperature raise. Whole cycle will be diturbed. Global warming for example has occured due to pollutions,deforestation. Which leads to lot of recent problems like the oxygen layer is torn. There is climate changes, need of products is increased. Chipko andolan was one of the step taken by the indians in 1970’s. The people hugged the tree to save it from cuting of it. Today human is running behind time and fanancial status by puting in lot of efforts. He is least bothered about the nature. Every man want his finacial status to be high.He is constructing huge and scads of building, industries, factories, bridges, roads for which they are destroying the beatiful nature. In this race we are least bothered about the nature. Resulting in weather change; heavy rain in the desert area and temperature raise in tropical regions. Human is the creator of all. We have to think and know very well that â€Å"human is dependent on nature and vise versa†. To conclude with we should try to save every plant and animal species regardless of our fanancial well being,effort,time. How to cite Biodiversity, Essay examples

Business Discourse Colonizing Philanthropy

Question: Discuss about the Business Discourse Colonizing Philanthropy. Answer: Introduction: The vibrant nature of the current market environment has subjected corporation to diverse ways of maintaining competitive advantage and market their brand name. Factors such as technological advancement, corporate unions, globalization and improvement in cash flow have opened up the market to new players further intensifying market competition. Therefore, organizations now strive to marry social and economic activities. The main reason for setting up a corporation is to obtain profits. However, to achieve this goal, there must be close coordination with the society. Furthermore, close observance of business ethics is vital for good performance. This notion of creating a positive societal image has seen the rise of corporate philanthropy in the global market. This increase has triggered mixed feeling in the economic world with some critic raising question on the effectiveness of this measure in the corporate world and society. However, there are those who support this move and view it as a humanistic move. Therefore, this paper aims at exploring the function and effectiveness of corporate philanthropy. This is with the goal of justifying if more organization should adopt or avoid this course of action. The term corporate philanthropy has gained popularity in the modern world with many people attaching its meaning to the acts of charity. However, it is vital to draw clear, distinctive lines between charity and corporate philanthropy. So, what is corporate philanthropy? According to Paetzold (2010, p. 60), Corporate Philanthropy is the act of corporations donating part of their profits or resources such as human resource to nonprofit organizations. Paetzold notes that the term is often used together with corporate giving. According to Brennan (2011, p. 544), the term has the same meaning as corporate social responsibility (CSR). Brennan further elaborates that such actions are geared towards addressing the welfare of the society and hence should be viewed as significantly independent on a business profitability. Therefore, according to Brennan, it is the obligation of the corporation to address the needs of the society regardless of whether they are operating on a profit or not. His view disagrees with Paetzold (2010), who urges that philanthropic actions are optional and depend on organization benefits. Such discrepancies on the meaning of the term have also led to disagreements on the relevance of corporate charitable activities. However, Mullerat (2010) points out that there is a big difference between corporate philanthropy and corporate social responsibility. According to Mullerat (2010, p.51), the main difference between the two is that philanthropy entails the acts of giving to the needy people or entities through charitable aid while CSR is an integration of managerial attitudes and strategies to promote human and global welfare which are incorporated in an organization's operations. He further outlines that charitable giving and philanthropic actions are distinct from accompanies business and are not in its strategic plan. Hence, corporate social responsibility is a form of management and not a way of giving donations. Organizations engage in various corporate philanthropic activities. These practices vary according to organizations. However, there are two conventional approaches employed by organizations in achieving this quest. One is through matching gift programs and the second one is through volunteer donation programs. This method aims at giving a donation to nonprofit organizations addressing the conditions of the needy in the society. According to Burlingame (2004), matching gift programs are contribution programs that will match employees donation to qualifying nonprofit organizations. On the other hand, a volunteer donation program is when the employees donate their time to nonprofit entities. The donations are directed to organizations which deal with issues affecting humanity. For instance, they can be used to finance education program, health problems or clean water supply. The choice depends on the donating organizations. Some agencies such as Google have advanced their philanthropic approaches from mere donations to technological advancements. When the concept of corporate philanthropy first emerged, people associated it with charitable gifts and never attached business importance to the practice. However, Paetzold (2010, p.60) outlines that modern corporations have aligned this practices with their activities to enhance their competitive market advantage. This is what he calls New corporate philanthropy. According to Paetzold, this change is due to the pressure to balance between stakeholders objectives and the overall communities expectation of responsibility. Therefore, it is more like a tag of war. Remember both the stakeholders and the society is critical components of an institution. The stakeholders own the firm while the community purchases the good and services from organizations. Therefore, it is the role of executives to monitor these opposing forces. They are opposing since each would want their demands addressed adequately. The question on the effectiveness of corporate philanthropic has raised heated debates over the years. However, a keen analysis of these arguments leads to one solution that is the efficiency of this initiatives depends on perception. Because from a financial point of view, one might see them as a waste of money since the aim of a business is to maximize profits (lucky, et al., 2012). For the socialists, the move is effective since it addresses societal needs. However, for the economists, the effectiveness of the initiative will depend on the organization's objectives. According to Bruch and Walter (2005), a cohesive philanthropic strategy is essential for the success of corporate philanthropy. They reiterate that most the failed charitable initiatives by firms are due to lack of proper planning. Hence they advocate for the strategic philanthropic approach. This is the one who unites both the needs of the external players and the unique competencies of the donating firm. Organizations have employed corporate philanthropy as a tool to create a positive public image. This is more common in a firm whose operations have negative societal impacts such as the tobacco industries. According to Tesler and Malone (2008), Philip Moris succeeded in changing the image of the tobacco industry in the United States through philanthropic initiatives. His efforts made him win over policymakers, public health policies and thus improving his company image. However, they note that such moves cause more harm than good to the society. This is because companies continue producing harmful substances to the society and cover up using philanthropic initiatives. This is only an indication of how powerful Corporate philanthropic is on communitys psychology. In a study to establish the effects of philanthropy initiatives on consumer-company identification, Lii and Lee (2012), found out that corporate philanthropic efforts have significant effects on consumer-company identification and brand attitude. However, they note that the level of the effect depends on individual organization's charitable efforts. This is where leadership efficiency plays a vital role (Peloza et al., 2009). Leaders are the ones with the mandate of designing corporate philanthropic strategies. Since many organizations are doing the same thing, individual brilliance of a leader can make is or her initiative more efficient than the rest. However, the level of effectiveness of this actions has been questioned. According to Porter and Kramer (2012), corporate philanthropy is on the decline because most executives see them as a no-win situation. This is because it creates tension between the society and investors. The investor focuses on maximizing short-term profits of their investments while the community continues to demand more contributions from the firms. Porter and Kramer note that the more the companies contribute, the more the society demands. Furthermore, the executives are always in tight situations to explain and justify charitable disbursements on bottom-line expenditures (Porter Kramer, 2002). Porter and Kramer see corporate philanthropy as an ineffective approach of marking a firm brand. They reinstate the role of a corporation, which is to make profits. Furthermore, they argue that a company is a tool of the stakeholders who own it. Therefore, it is only the stakeholders who should decide how to spend t heir income not the organization. When establishments engage in corporate philanthropy, they infringe the investor's freedom of using funds from their investments (Porter Kramer, 2002). They further acknowledge that, regardless of the name given to this initiative such as smart or strategic philanthropy, an overhaul is required in the whole approach to clearly defines the benefits which stakeholders and the society obtain from this practices. Wirgau et al. (2010) concur with the arguments put forth by Porter and Krammer, on the relevance of this, acts to the society. They claim that the modern firms have diluted the meaning of corporate philanthropy to marketing philanthropy. Organizations are using the approach of donation to the campaign for consumption of individual product which some are of adverse effects to the society. This is against business ethics; because a good thing cannot be used to cover for the bad. Therefore, companies should be transparent on the contents in the p roducts they produce. Conclusively, corporate philanthropy is an excellent and smart idea. The program has been effective in supporting numerous humanitarian activities such as the fight against HIV and AID, poverty eradication, clean water provision and mitigating epidemics. Presently, such donations are the ones supporting those individuals in nations experiencing civil wars and terrorist attacks. There are kids whose education have been financed through this approach. Therefore, it is a vital move towards attaining a better society. However, proper planning is essential to maximize the efficiency of this program. Furthermore, firms should avoid using this approach to exploit the community through promoting consumption of products which cause health problems such as tobacco. However, I would encourage more organization to incorporate this practice in their activities and construct strategies to efficiently execute it since it is a way of appreciating the society. Furthermore, it is a way of marketing th eir brand through creating a positive public image. Reference List Brennan, D., 2011. Corporate Social Responsibility: The Corporate Governance of the 21st Century International Bar Association Series. 2nd ed. AH Alphen: Kluwer Law International. Bruch, H. Walter, F., 2005. The Keys to Rethinking Corporate Philanthropy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1), pp. 49-55. Burlingame, D., 2004. Philanthropy in America: A Comprehensive Historical Encyclopedia, Volume 1. Califonia: ABC-CLIO. Lii, Y.-S. Lee, M., 2012. Doing Right Leads to Doing Well: When the Type of CSR and Reputation Interact to Affect Consumer Evaluations of the Firm. Journal of Business Ethics, pp. 69-81. Lucky, O.-I. E., Olusegun, I. A. Bakar, S. M., 2012. Determinants of Business Success: Trust Or Business Policy? Researchers World, 3(3), pp. 37-42. Mullerat, R., 2010. International Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Corporations in the Economic Order of the 21st Century. AH Alphen: Kluwer Law International. Paetzold, K., 2010. Corporate Social Responsibility: An International Marketing Approach. Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag. Peloza, J., Hudson, S. Hassay, D. N., 2009. The Marketing of Employee Volunteerism. Journal of Business Ethics, suppl. Supplement, pp. 371-386. Porter, M. E. Kramer, M. R., 2002. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard business review, 80(12), pp. 56-68. Tesler, l. E. Malone, R., 2008. Ethical Conduct in Public and Private Arenas: Corporate Philanthropy, Lobbying, and Public Health Policy. American Journal of Public Health, 98(12), pp. 123-2133. Wirgau, J. S., Farley, K. W. Jensen, C., 2010. Is Business Discourse Colonizing Philanthropy? A Critical Discourse Analysis of (PRODUCT) RED. Voluntas, 21(4), pp. 611-630.